Demo 17 · Impact Report Studio · for sales & applications teams

Make the customer’s people the heroes.

A rep drops in visit photos, e-mails, notes and setup sheets. The AI screens them, asks only the questions that change a number, proposes suggestions the rep rules on, computes the savings with models you can read, and composes a report the customer’s team will want to forward. Every number traces to a source.

Sample data · fictional shop, distributor and people Northgate Precision (fictional), a sample machine shop · co-branded with Meridian Sample Supply (fictional)

  1. 01 Material in
  2. 02 Questions
  3. 03 Suggestions
  4. 04 The numbers
  5. 05 The report
  6. 06 Check it
Screened before any AI readExport-control markings (ITAR, EAR) and NDA flags stop a file at the door. A flagged file stays human-only.
Sources deleted when you sayPhotos, e-mails and notes are deleted within 30 days after you ask or our agreement ends, never on a timer. The finished report is kept.
Originals on your storageThe original files are archived on your own company storage, not ours.

Step 1 · Material in

Nine files from one shop visit.

Everything the rep brought back: photos from the floor, the programmer’s e-mail, purchasing’s spend figures, a voice note from the parking lot, the setup sheet and the tool-change log, plus public context the AI found and cited.

  • P1 Photo Photo · spindle load screen during the trial Load held at 62% at 18,000 rpm Screened · clear
  • P2 Photo Photo · chips from the adaptive roughing pass Uniform chips, no re-cutting Screened · clear
  • P3 Photo Photo · coolant refractometer Reads 4% against an 8% target Screened · clear
  • E1 E-mail E-mail · programmer, trial results Adaptive path: roughing 1.4× faster in the trial Screened · clear
  • E2 E-mail E-mail · purchasing, tool spend Tool spend on this family last year Screened · clear
  • N1 Voice note Voice note · rep, walking the floor About 2,000 parts a month; second shift started Screened · clear
  • S1 Setup Setup sheet · op 20 Cycle 14.0 min: 3.0 fixed, 11.0 scaling, 65% in the cut Screened · clear
  • S2 Setup Tool-change log · six weeks Finisher life 1.6× with the coated tool Screened · clear
  • W1 Public Public context · shop newsletter (fictional) Announced a second shift this spring Screened · clear

9/9 screened · 0 flagged · Day 0 of 30 · report kept

Demo only: nothing on this page calls an AI or leaves your browser. The page’s own security policy blocks outbound connections.

Step 2 · The questions that matter

Three questions, not thirty.

The AI asks only where an answer changes a number on the report. Pick an answer; the numbers in step 4 follow.

Q1 Your voice note says “about 2,000 a month.” Which annual volume should the report use? N1

Why it asks: Volume multiplies every minute saved. Guessing high would make the whole report look inflated.

Q2 What shop rate values a freed spindle hour at Northgate? E2

Why it asks: Freed hours are capacity. The rate turns them into money the owner recognizes.

Q3 Purchasing sent two tool-spend figures. Which one covers only this tool family? E2

Why it asks: Tool savings apply to the tools that change, not the whole crib.

Step 3 · Suggestions the rep rules on

Accept, reject, edit, or add a note.

Nothing reaches the report until the rep accepts it. Notes can be typed or dictated on the drive home. Watch the report (beside this on a wide screen, below on a phone) rewrite itself as you decide.

4 accepted · 0 rejected · 1 waiting

  1. S1 Proven in trial E1P2

    Rough with an adaptive toolpath and a 3-flute high-efficiency end mill

    The trial path held a constant tool engagement, so the cutter could run deeper and faster without overload.

    Credits Dana R., CNC programmer

    Accepted
  2. S2 Proven in trial P1S1

    Run the finisher at 18,000 rpm, holding the same chip load

    Feed rises with spindle speed, so each tooth still takes the same bite. Spindle load stayed well inside the limit.

    Credits Marcus T., Lead machinist

    Accepted
  3. S3 Proven in trial S2E2

    Switch the finisher to the coated grade

    Six weeks of tool-change records show the coated finisher lasting longer on this part.

    Credits Priya S., Second-shift operator

    Accepted
  4. S4 Phase 2 · unproven N1

    Combine ops 20 and 30 into one fixture

    Removes a second load, a re-clamp and an inspection hand-off. Not yet trialed.

    Credits Owen L., Manufacturing engineer

    Accepted
  5. S5 Action item P3

    Bring coolant back to the 8% target

    A 4% mix shortens tool life and invites built-up edge in aluminum. An action item, not a savings claim.

    Credits Sam K., Maintenance lead

    Waiting for the rep

Dictate is simulated in this demo: it types a sample phrase and records nothing. In the service, a voice note is transcribed and the rep checks the words before they reach the report.

Step 4 · The numbers, with the math showing

Three models you can read.

Proven changes make the headline. Unproven ideas become a Phase 2 scenario, clearly marked. Move any slider.

Model A

Cycle time & capacity

24,000 / yr

Answered in question 1. N1

$125 / hr

Answered in question 2.

65%

Read from the setup sheet. S1

1.40×

Applies only if the toolpath card is accepted. E1

15%

Unproven. Shown as a scenario, never in the headline. N1

Spindle hours freed / yr
1,158
More parts, same hours
+26.1%
Value at shop rate
$144,702

new = 3.0 + 11.0 × (1 − 0%) × (0.65 ÷ 1.68 + 0.35) = 11.1 min

Phase 2: new = fixed + scaling × (1 − 15%) × (…) = 9.9 min · 1,644 hrs / yr · scenario only

Model B

Speeds & feeds, constant chip load

18,000 rpm

Sample machine tops out at 24,000 rpm. Chip load stays the same, so feed rises with speed. P1

Finisher speeds and feeds before and after, at constant chip load
SpindleFeed
Before15,000 rpm180 in/min
After18,000 rpm216 in/min

Chip load held at 0.0040 in per tooth, 3 flutes.

feed = 18,000 rpm × 3 flutes × 0.0040 in = 216 in/min · cutting time ÷ 1.20

Model C

Tool life & spend

$38,000

Answered in question 3. E2

60% · 1.60× life

Measured from six weeks of tool changes. S2

70%

Steady state. Year one follows the ramp below.

Saved / yr, steady state
$9,975
Year one, on the ramp
$6,234

saving = $38,000 × (1 − 1 ÷ 1.60) × 70% = $9,975 / yr

An illustration on fictional numbers, not a promise of results. In the service, every input carries its source, and anything the customer has not proven stays out of the headline.

The service

Every visit, a report the customer keeps.

Visit photos, e-mails, notes and setup sheets become a traceable savings report that makes the customer’s own people the heroes, co-branded for distributors.

  • For manufacturers’ and distributors’ sales and applications teams, with co-branding for distributor partners.
  • Upload photos, e-mails, notes and setup sheets; rule on suggestions by typing or by voice.
  • Screening before any AI read, sources deleted within 30 days of your request (never automatically), originals archived on your own storage.
  • Shared by private link or PDF. Your people review every word before a customer sees it.

Impact Report Studio

Pricing: ask us

Tell us about your team and how many visits you report on, and we will reply with pricing in writing.

Want to see how visit material is protected? The Glass Box walks a file from arrival to its deletion.